Pendle Finance has emerged as a leading yield optimization protocol in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space, offering innovative financial instruments that allow users to tokenize and trade future yield. Deployed across Ethereum and Arbitrum, Pendle enables users to separate yield from underlying assets—unlocking new strategies for passive income and speculative trading. This article dives deep into Pendle’s current ecosystem, economic model, key auxiliary protocols like Penpie and Equilibria, and the core challenges it faces moving forward.
Pendle Protocol Overview
Pendle Finance operates as a structured products platform where users can tokenize future yield into two components: Yield Tokens (YT) and Principal Tokens (PT). This separation allows for flexible yield trading, hedging, and leverage strategies. Since its v2 launch in late 2022—with an updated economic model—Pendle has seen consistent growth in total value locked (TVL), now surpassing $126 million.
Total Value Locked and Asset Composition
As of mid-2025, Pendle's TVL reflects strong adoption, driven primarily by Liquid Staked Tokens (LSTs) such as stETH and rETH. These LSTs constitute the majority of liquidity, with GLP, stablecoins, and other tokens making up roughly 30% of the total.
👉 Discover how yield-tokenizing protocols are reshaping DeFi returns.
LSTs derive their base yield from Ethereum’s proof-of-stake (PoS) staking rewards, typically averaging around 4% APR. While this base yield is relatively stable, it lacks volatility—limiting its appeal for active traders. However, Pendle enhances these yields through its veToken and gauge voting system, allowing LST pools to achieve boosted APRs between 10% and 30%, depending on incentive alignment.
In contrast, assets like GLP offer more dynamic returns. GLP’s income stems from trader P&L and 70% of protocol fees, making its yield more variable and attractive during high-volatility market conditions. This is reflected in trading volume data: while LSD-related assets account for 54.82% of historical volume on Pendle, GLP surged to 51.29% of daily volume during recent active market phases.
Trading Volume and Market Activity
Pendle’s daily trading volume generally remains below $1 million, indicating that the protocol is still in a growth phase rather than mass adoption. The volume distribution aligns closely with asset utility:
- LSDs (54.82%): Driven by long-term yield seekers.
- GLP (24.09% historically, up to 51.29% recently): Spikes during volatile markets due to higher yield variability.
This suggests that GLP-based pools have greater yield tradability—a key metric for assessing financial instruments in DeFi. Higher yield variance creates arbitrage and speculation opportunities, increasing on-chain activity.
Economic Model and Tokenomics
At the heart of Pendle’s sustainability lies its PENDLE token economy, designed to incentivize long-term liquidity and governance participation.
Token Distribution and Emissions
The PENDLE token was distributed across several categories including team, investors, and community incentives. Notably:
- Team, advisors, and investors: Fully unlocked.
- Liquidity mining: Initially released 1.2 million tokens per week for the first 26 weeks.
- Emission decay: Weekly emissions decrease by 1.1% thereafter, stabilizing at an annual inflation rate of 2% of circulating supply after week 260.
As of mid-2025 (approximately weeks 113–117), weekly emissions have dropped to around 450,000 PENDLE, down from 667,705 in late 2022. This gradual reduction aims to balance user incentives with token sustainability.
vePENDLE: Governance and Incentive Alignment
Launched in November 2022, the vePENDLE model locks PENDLE tokens for durations ranging from one week to two years. Holders receive voting power proportional to lock duration and amount, influencing reward distribution across liquidity pools.
Key features of vePENDLE include:
- Gauge voting: Users direct emissions to preferred pools every Thursday (UTC).
- Fee sharing: vePENDLE holders earn 80% of AMM pool fees from voted pools.
- YT fee rebate: Access to 3% of YT-generated yield.
- No direct protocol revenue sharing, unlike some other ve-model protocols.
Despite these benefits, demand for vePENDLE remains largely limited to liquidity providers. Unlike Curve’s veCRV model—which attracts bribes from project teams seeking deeper liquidity—there is currently minimal incentive for LST issuers to bribe vePENDLE voters. This limits external demand and could impact long-term token utility.
As of July 3rd, approximately 37 million PENDLE tokens were locked, with an average lock time of 392 days, signaling strong holder conviction.
Auxiliary Protocols: Penpie and Equilibria
To enhance capital efficiency, third-party protocols like Penpie and Equilibria have built on top of Pendle’s ve model—allowing LPs to boost yields without directly locking PENDLE.
Penpie: Yield Aggregation with mPENDLE
Penpie operates on Ethereum and Arbitrum, converting user-deposited PENDLE into mPENDLE, which represents a share of pooled vePENDLE stakes. This enables automatic voting power delegation and reward boosting.
Revenue distribution:
- 83% to LPs
- 12% to mPENDLE holders
- 5% to vlPNP (governance token)
PNP is Penpie’s governance token. Locking PNP yields vlPNP, granting fee shares and voting rights. A unique feature is the 60-day unlocking period, during which penalties start at 80% and decay non-linearly—discouraging short-term exits while preserving passive income during cooldown.
👉 Explore how DeFi yield boosters are evolving beyond traditional staking.
Equilibria: Competitive Boosting via ePENDLE
Equilibria follows a similar structure but uses ePENDLE as its representation token. Key differences:
- 77.5% to LPs
- 12.5% to ePENDLE holders
- 7.5% to vlEQB
- 2.5% to treasury
xEQB can be converted into vlEQB for governance. However, unlike mPENDLE, ePENDLE conversion is irreversible—and the ePENDLE/PENDLE liquidity pool has been paused since June 19th, creating exit friction.
Moreover, mPENDLE on Wombat Exchange trades at a significant discount (~1:0.72), indicating market concerns over redemption risk or utility decay.
Comparative Insights
| Feature | Penpie | Equilibria |
|---|---|---|
| LP Reward Share | 83% | 77.5% |
| Governance Token | PNP/vlPNP | EQB/xEQB/vlEQB |
| Unlock Mechanism | 60-day linear penalty decay | Irreversible lock |
| Pool Availability | Active (Wombat) | ePENDLE pool paused |
Penpie appears more LP-friendly due to higher reward allocation and better liquidity options. In identical conditions, rational LPs would likely favor Penpie.
Risks and Challenges
Despite solid fundamentals and growing TVL, Pendle faces structural risks:
- Persistent Token Emissions: Ongoing PENDLE inflation makes it difficult to sustain high APRs over time.
- Limited External Demand for vePENDLE: Without issuer-side bribes (like on Curve), long-term vote-locking incentives may weaken.
- Locked Liquidity Trapped in m/ePENDLE: With pools inactive or de-pegged, many users cannot exit cleanly—creating latent sell pressure.
- Competition from Newer Yield Protocols: Emerging platforms may offer better UX or hybrid models.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is Pendle Finance used for?
A: Pendle allows users to tokenize future yield from assets like stETH or GLP into tradeable tokens (YT/PT), enabling yield speculation, hedging, and optimized returns via veToken mechanics.
Q: How does vePENDLE work?
A: Users lock PENDLE for up to 2 years to receive vePENDLE, which grants voting power to direct emissions to specific pools and earn a share of trading fees (up to 80%) and YT yield (3%).
Q: Why are Penpie and Equilibria important?
A: They let liquidity providers earn boosted rewards without locking PENDLE directly—improving capital efficiency and lowering entry barriers.
Q: Can I lose money using Pendle or its boosters?
A: Yes—impermanent loss, de-peg risks (especially with mPENDLE), smart contract risk, and volatile yields mean careful risk assessment is required.
Q: Is PENDLE a good long-term investment?
A: It depends on sustained protocol revenue, adoption of YT/PT markets, and whether external parties begin bribing vePENDLE votes—currently a key missing piece.
Q: What’s the difference between mPENDLE and ePENDLE?
A: Both represent indirect vePENDLE exposure. mPENDLE offers gradual unlock penalties; ePENDLE locks are irreversible. Currently, mPENDLE has better liquidity support.
Final Thoughts
Pendle continues to build solid fundamentals with rising TVL and active innovation in yield structuring. Its integration with LSTs and volatile assets like GLP offers diversified opportunities for yield optimization. However, long-term success hinges on solving emission sustainability and expanding vePENDLE demand beyond LPs.
👉 Stay ahead in DeFi by tracking real-time tokenomics and protocol trends.
With auxiliary protocols enhancing accessibility, Pendle remains a pivotal player in the next evolution of yield finance—provided it adapts to growing competitive and economic pressures.
Core Keywords: Pendle Finance, PENDLE token, veToken model, yield optimization, liquidity mining, DeFi protocol, YT/PT tokens, GLP yield.