In the evolving landscape of digital assets, Hong Kong has emerged as a key hub for regulated crypto innovation. At the forefront is OSL, a subsidiary of BC Tech (HK: 863), which became the first licensed digital asset exchange in Hong Kong under the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) framework, holding both Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 7 (providing automated trading services) licenses. With its parent company publicly listed, audited by a Big Four firm, and offering insured custody solutions, OSL stands out in a market still grappling with trust and transparency.
As Hong Kong rolls out its new virtual asset regulatory regime, we sat down with Hubert Hu, CFO of BC Tech, to discuss the future of crypto regulation, stablecoins, retail market expansion, and the transformative potential of Security Token Offerings (STOs) and Real World Assets (RWAs).
Banking Challenges for Crypto Platforms: Risk vs. Reward
One major hurdle for crypto platforms—even compliant ones—is securing banking relationships. Traditional banks remain cautious about onboarding digital asset firms.
👉 Discover how compliant crypto platforms are overcoming banking barriers in Asia.
Hubert Hu explains:
"Licensed and compliant crypto platforms don’t face significant issues opening bank accounts. The real challenge lies with unregulated exchanges. After the collapse of crypto-friendly U.S. banks like Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and Silvergate, many non-compliant platforms were forced to approach traditional financial institutions. However, banks are wary due to concerns around KYC, anti-money laundering (AML), market surveillance, and client asset misuse."
Banks also weigh cost versus benefit. Serving crypto clients requires robust compliance infrastructure, yet the profitability may not justify the risk. This cost-risk imbalance leads to conservative policies—especially when most traditional banks don’t see crypto as a core revenue driver.
Regulating Stablecoins: Transparency, Trust, and Use Cases
Stablecoins have become essential infrastructure in the digital economy, but their regulatory status remains ambiguous in many jurisdictions.
OSL has contributed to policy discussions on stablecoin regulation in Hong Kong. According to Hu, key priorities include:
- Licensing and oversight: Stablecoin issuers should be licensed asset managers subject to strict regulatory supervision.
- Transparency and audits: Annual audits by independent parties must verify that reserves match issued tokens.
- Asset protection: Issuers must demonstrate sufficient liquidity to meet redemption requests at par value.
- Dual functionality: Ideal stablecoins should support both payments and yield-generating activities—similar to money market funds like Yu’e Bao.
While there’s speculation about a Hong Kong dollar-backed stablecoin, Hu believes it’s unlikely. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has prioritized the development of digital Hong Kong dollar (e-HKD), a central bank digital currency (CBDC), which serves a different purpose than private-sector stablecoins.
However, dollar-backed stablecoins issued under Hong Kong’s regulatory framework could gain global traction. Given the massive international demand for USD-pegged tokens—and existing concerns over transparency—being regulated by the SFC would offer stronger investor protection than current market alternatives.
Client Asset Protection: How Hong Kong Sets the Standard
Under Hong Kong’s regulatory model, custody and trading operations cannot be separated. Exchanges holding Type 1 and Type 7 licenses must manage client asset custody in-house—and those assets must remain within Hong Kong.
This high barrier ensures security but increases operational complexity.
Key safeguards include:
- Complete segregation of client and platform assets via dedicated trust accounts.
- A wholly-owned subsidiary acting as a licensed trust company to hold client funds.
- Mandatory insurance: 100% coverage for hot wallets, 50% for cold wallets.
- Cold storage requirement: At least 98% of digital assets must be held offline.
- Round-the-clock cybersecurity monitoring.
Even in worst-case scenarios—such as platform insolvency—client assets are protected through the trust structure and can be returned directly.
Regulators and auditors also conduct on-chain verification to confirm asset existence and ownership, reinforcing transparency.
👉 Learn how institutional-grade custody is reshaping investor confidence in crypto.
Expanding to Retail: Strategy Behind OSL’s Market Shift
Historically serving only institutional and high-net-worth clients, OSL applied for retail trading permissions following Hong Kong’s June 1, 2023 virtual asset policy update.
Hu outlines the rationale:
"Retail investors remain a vital part of the market ecosystem. While we believe institutional adoption will dominate long-term, retail participation is crucial today—especially with regulatory support for qualified retail access."
The technical transition was seamless thanks to OSL’s existing robust trading infrastructure. However, marketing and customer service differ significantly between retail and institutional segments.
To scale efficiently:
- OSL partners with local securities firms to reach retail audiences.
- It leverages AI-driven customer service, including an OpenAI-powered bot prototype capable of handling inquiries, executing trades, and analyzing data—reducing reliance on human sales teams.
- Automated systems help manage lower-margin, high-volume retail transactions without inflating costs.
STO and RWA: The Future of Tokenized Finance
OSL is one of only two platforms in Hong Kong authorized to facilitate Security Token Offerings (STOs)—blockchain-based representations of traditional securities like stocks or bonds.
Compared to conventional issuance, STOs offer:
- Lower costs by eliminating intermediaries like underwriters and custodians.
- 24/7 trading on blockchain networks, increasing liquidity.
- Global investor access, especially to tech-native audiences who may lack traditional brokerage accounts.
- Programmable features, such as automatic dividend distribution or embedded usage rights.
Japan offers a leading example: Nomura Securities has tokenized real estate and even Disney resort hotel revenues, granting investors both financial returns and experiential benefits like free stays or souvenirs.
Yet despite promise, STO and RWA adoption remain early-stage, primarily due to:
- Immature regulatory frameworks.
- Lack of standardized infrastructure.
- Slow institutional understanding of blockchain mechanics.
"The market needs time," Hu notes. "Regulators must learn to approve innovative products efficiently. But once compliance pathways are clear, growth will accelerate."
Market Volatility and Investor Sentiment
Like many blockchain-linked public companies, BC Tech has faced headwinds. A 64.3% drop in revenue and a net loss of HK$550 million in 2022 reflect broader industry challenges—from the FTX collapse to macroeconomic downturns.
Hu attributes investor caution to:
- High-profile failures eroding trust.
- Aggressive U.S. regulatory actions affecting sentiment.
- Cyclical bear markets common in emerging sectors.
Still, he sees signs of recovery: "More investors are cautiously returning. As speculative players exit, the industry can mature sustainably—benefiting all legitimate market participants."
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is OSL the only licensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong?
A: OSL was the first and remains one of the most prominent licensed exchanges under Hong Kong’s SFC regime. While others have since entered or applied, OSL is unique as the only publicly listed, audited, and insured platform with full custody integration.
Q: Can retail investors use OSL now?
A: Yes. Following Hong Kong’s June 2023 policy shift, OSL applied to offer retail trading services and is working toward full compliance for broader access.
Q: What makes Hong Kong’s crypto regulation stand out?
A: Its emphasis on investor protection—mandatory asset segregation, in-house custody, insurance requirements, and strict licensing—sets a global benchmark for safe and transparent digital asset trading.
Q: Are stablecoins legal in Hong Kong?
A: There is no outright ban, but no formal licensing regime for stablecoin issuers yet. Regulatory details are expected in 2025 as part of ongoing policy development.
Q: How does STO differ from ICO?
A: Unlike speculative Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), STOs represent regulated financial instruments backed by real assets or cash flows, offering greater legal clarity and investor protection.
Q: Why did BC Tech’s stock perform poorly recently?
A: Market-wide crypto downturns, reduced trading volumes, and sector-wide loss of investor confidence post-FTX contributed to declining valuations across blockchain equities—including BC Tech.
👉 Explore how regulated markets are driving the next phase of crypto growth.