The cryptocurrency market saw a dramatic recovery recently, with Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), XRP, and a wave of altcoins posting strong gains. Notably, BTC reclaimed the $8,000 price level—a bullish signal that energized investor sentiment across the board. But amid this broad-based rally, one unusual trend stood out: Bitcoin forks, including Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Bitcoin SV (BSV), and even lesser-known variants like Bitcoin Diamond, experienced explosive price movements.
According to CoinMarketCap data, BSV surged by an astonishing 40%, while BCH—Bitcoin’s most prominent fork—climbed 14% in just 24 hours. This sudden spike has reignited interest in these alternative chains, prompting speculation about their long-term viability. However, despite the short-term momentum, there’s a critical structural factor that suggests this rally may not be sustainable.
👉 Discover how market dynamics are shaping the future of digital assets.
Why Is Bitcoin Cash Surging?
The immediate catalyst behind Bitcoin Cash’s sharp price increase lies in legal developments involving Dr. Craig S. Wright, the controversial figure who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator.
Recent court filings revealed that Wright submitted documentation referencing a third “Tulip Trust”—a rumored custodial fund allegedly holding billions of dollars worth of dormant Bitcoin. This disclosure, part of a 428-document legal dump, fueled speculation that Wright may soon gain control over vast amounts of BTC.
“New: Craig Wright just so happened to have a third ‘Tulip Trust’ set up to hold that missing $10 billion fund.”
— Brendan Jay Sullivan, crypto commentator
If true, this could mean a massive sell-off of Bitcoin is imminent. But why would that benefit BCH and BSV?
The logic is rooted in Wright’s long-stated intent to undermine the original Bitcoin network in favor of his preferred forks. Investors believe that once he accesses these funds, he might flood the BTC market with supply to crash its price—while simultaneously using capital to boost BCH and BSV through strategic buying or ecosystem investments.
This speculative narrative has driven short-term buying pressure on the forks, especially among traders anticipating a coordinated market shift.
The Hidden Threat: Halving Events Looming for BCH and BSV
While the Tulip Trust news offers a compelling short-term explanation for the rally, it overlooks a deeper, more systemic risk: the upcoming block reward halvings for both Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV.
Like Bitcoin, these networks are designed to cut miner rewards in half at regular intervals—approximately every four years—to control inflation and maintain scarcity. Bitcoin’s halving is widely anticipated as a bullish event due to reduced supply pressure. However, for BCH and BSV, the same mechanism could trigger a very different outcome.
Benjamin Celermajer, analyst at CoinMetrics and Magnet Capital, highlighted this danger in a detailed Twitter thread. His analysis points to a critical issue: mining economics.
Mining Disparity Between BTC and BCH
Bitcoin Cash currently has a significantly higher block height than Bitcoin—meaning more blocks have been mined on its chain. This discrepancy stems from earlier mining behavior and adjustments in difficulty targeting. While it may seem technical, the implication is serious:
When BCH and BSV undergo their halvings—expected in April—miner rewards will drop by 50%. Unless the price of these tokens doubles overnight, mining them will become far less profitable than mining Bitcoin.
And here’s the catch: Bitcoin’s own halving occurs about a month later, in May. That timing gap creates a powerful incentive for miners to abandon BCH and BSV before their rewards are cut—and redirect their computational power to BTC.
Celermajer warns:
“In April, when miners start receiving half the BCH and BSV rewards they currently receive, their profits will halve (unless price doubles). This will lead to miners switching to mine Bitcoin which will not have a reduction in profitability until May.”
Such a mass exodus could destabilize the networks by reducing hash rate, increasing vulnerability to attacks, and undermining confidence in transaction security.
Why This Could Spell Trouble for Forks
A declining hash rate doesn’t just affect network security—it directly impacts investor trust. If users perceive BCH or BSV as less secure or less economically viable post-halving, selling pressure could mount rapidly.
Moreover, unlike Bitcoin—which enjoys dominant hash power and global institutional support—BCH and BSV lack diversified mining ecosystems. They rely heavily on concentrated mining pools, some of which are believed to be aligned with Wright himself. This centralization increases systemic risk; if key players pull out, the entire network could unravel quickly.
Historically, smaller blockchains have struggled after halvings when prices failed to rise fast enough to offset reduced rewards. Without strong fundamentals—such as widespread adoption, active development, or compelling use cases—these networks face an uphill battle to retain both miners and users.
FAQ: Understanding the Risks Behind Bitcoin Forks
Q: What causes a cryptocurrency halving?
A: Halving is a programmed event where block rewards for miners are cut in half. It's built into the protocol of many cryptocurrencies to control inflation and mimic scarcity over time.
Q: Why is the halving bad for BCH and BSV but good for BTC?
A: Bitcoin has a much larger market cap, higher liquidity, broader adoption, and stronger miner incentives. Even after its halving, BTC is expected to remain profitable for miners due to its price resilience and network effect—unlike its smaller forks.
Q: Can BCH or BSV avoid collapse after the halving?
A: Only if their prices rise dramatically before or immediately after the event. Otherwise, reduced profitability will likely drive miners away, weakening network security and triggering investor concern.
Q: Is Craig Wright really Satoshi Nakamoto?
A: This remains unproven and highly controversial. While Wright claims to be Bitcoin’s creator and has presented documents in court, the broader crypto community remains skeptical due to lack of verifiable cryptographic proof.
Q: Should I sell my BCH or BSV holdings?
A: That depends on your risk tolerance and investment strategy. Given the upcoming halving and structural weaknesses, many analysts advise caution. Always do your own research before making trading decisions.
👉 Stay ahead of major crypto events with real-time market insights.
Final Outlook: Rally Built on Speculation, Not Fundamentals
The recent surge in Bitcoin Cash and other forks reflects market sentiment driven by speculation—not underlying strength. While the Tulip Trust narrative has sparked excitement, it hinges on unverified claims and uncertain outcomes.
Meanwhile, the approaching halvings present a clear and present danger. With miner profitability poised to plummet and no guaranteed price surge to compensate, both BCH and BSV face serious headwinds.
For investors, this moment serves as a reminder: short-term pumps fueled by hype rarely withstand the test of structural realities. True value comes from adoption, decentralization, security—and above all—sustainable economics.
As the April halving draws closer, all eyes will be on hash rate trends and trading volumes. If miner outflows begin accelerating, it could signal the start of a deeper correction—one that no amount of legal drama may be able to reverse.
👉 Explore secure trading environments built for volatile markets.