The global financial landscape is undergoing a seismic shift as digital currencies gain momentum. With the rise of blockchain technology and increasing demand for faster, cheaper, and more accessible cross-border payments, three major players have emerged in the race to redefine how we transact: Libra (now Diem), central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) like China’s DC/EP, and Tether (USDT) — the world's largest stablecoin. Each brings unique strengths and challenges to the table, but only one may ultimately dominate the future of digital payments.
This analysis dives deep into their stability, security, and real-world applications to answer a critical question: Who will become the ultimate winner in the payment revolution?
Libra: The Ambitious Challenger
Stability: ★★★☆☆
Security: ★★★☆☆
Use Case Potential: ★★★★☆
Launched in 2019 by Facebook (now Meta), Libra — later rebranded as Diem — aimed to create a global digital currency backed by a basket of fiat currencies and short-term government securities. Designed to offer price stability and broad accessibility, Libra sought to disrupt traditional banking and remittance systems.
Stability – Promising in Theory, Risky in Practice
Libra’s value was originally pegged to a diversified reserve of assets including the U.S. dollar, euro, yen, pound, and Singapore dollar. This multi-currency backing was intended to reduce volatility compared to single-asset stablecoins like USDT.
However, its stability hinges on trust in the Libra Association, a consortium of private companies led by Meta. Unlike central banks, these entities are profit-driven and lack sovereign accountability. The absence of a hard cap on supply (unlike Bitcoin) raises concerns about potential over-issuance or manipulation — reminiscent of historical monetary failures like the collapse of the Bretton Woods system.
Moreover, regulatory pushback from governments worldwide — including the U.S., EU, and G7 nations — forced key partners like PayPal, Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe to withdraw. This erosion of support has significantly delayed Libra’s rollout and undermined confidence in its long-term viability.
👉 Discover how digital assets are reshaping global finance today.
Security – Strong Technical Foundation
From a technological standpoint, Libra leveraged a permissioned blockchain using the Rust programming language for high security and performance. Its custom Move language was designed to prevent smart contract vulnerabilities such as re-entrancy attacks.
User privacy was prioritized: identities were protected via public-key cryptography, transactions were pseudonymous, and user data was not linked to Facebook accounts. The LibraBFT consensus mechanism ensured high throughput and resistance to double-spending attacks.
Despite solid engineering, being a permissioned network means control remains concentrated among a few corporate members — limiting true decentralization and raising concerns about censorship or unilateral decision-making.
Use Case Potential – Massive Reach, Uncertain Adoption
With over 2.7 billion Facebook users globally, Libra had unparalleled potential for mass adoption. It could enable instant peer-to-peer payments, low-cost remittances, and frictionless cross-border commerce — all without relying on traditional bank accounts.
Yet, regulatory scrutiny remains its biggest hurdle. Governments fear loss of monetary sovereignty, anti-money laundering (AML) risks, and data privacy issues tied to Meta’s involvement. Until these concerns are resolved, widespread deployment remains unlikely.
DC/EP: The Sovereign Powerhouse
Stability: ★★★★★
Security: ★★★★★
Use Case Potential: ★★★★★
China’s Digital Currency Electronic Payment (DC/EP) — also known as e-CNY — represents the most advanced central bank digital currency (CBDC) project globally. Developed by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), it aims to digitize cash (M0) while maintaining full state control over monetary policy.
Stability – Backed by National Trust
As a direct liability of the central bank, DC/EP is fully backed by national credit. Every digital yuan is equivalent to physical RMB, ensuring absolute parity and legal tender status. Unlike privately issued stablecoins, there is no counterparty risk or reserve opacity.
Its stability is intrinsically tied to that of the Chinese yuan — which benefits from strong macroeconomic management and capital controls. While exchange rates fluctuate internationally, domestic purchasing power remains highly predictable.
Security – State-Level Protection with Privacy Trade-offs
DC/EP operates on a hybrid model: centrally issued by the PBOC but distributed through commercial banks. It uses a "loosely coupled account" system — allowing offline transactions via NFC even without internet access.
Counterfeit resistance is near-total due to cryptographic verification. However, while transaction details are anonymized for merchants and third parties, the central bank retains full auditability — enabling powerful surveillance capabilities for AML and tax compliance.
China’s robust fintech infrastructure — including Alipay and WeChat Pay — provides a ready ecosystem for DC/EP integration. Pilot programs in cities like Shenzhen and Suzhou have already demonstrated successful large-scale use.
👉 Explore secure platforms where you can manage digital assets with confidence.
Use Case Potential – Full Ecosystem Integration
DC/EP excels in versatility:
- Accepted anywhere electronic payments are used
- Supports offline transfers
- Enables programmable money features (e.g., time-limited subsidies)
- Facilitates cross-border settlements under controlled conditions
It directly competes with existing mobile wallets but offers superior monetary authority and resilience during financial crises. For China, DC/EP also serves strategic goals like advancing RMB internationalization and reducing reliance on SWIFT.
Other countries — including Sweden (e-krona), India (digital rupee), Thailand, Singapore, Canada, and Uruguay — are actively exploring similar CBDC models. But China leads in implementation speed and scale.
USDT: The Controversial Workhorse
Stability: ★★☆☆☆
Security: ★★☆☆☆
Use Case Potential: ★★☆☆☆
Tether (USDT) is the most widely used stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market. Issued by Tether Limited, it claims a 1:1 peg to the U.S. dollar and dominates crypto trading pairs — especially in regions with restricted fiat access.
Stability – Questionable Reserves
While USDT promises dollar parity, its reserves have long been shrouded in mystery. Repeated audits have failed to confirm full backing, and investigations revealed that USDT was used to cover losses at affiliated exchange Bitfinex.
In April 2019, it was disclosed that **$700 million had been withdrawn from reserves** to plug financial holes — sparking panic and temporary de-pegging events. Despite occasional price dips below $1, market demand keeps USDT circulating due to liquidity advantages.
Without regulatory oversight or transparent reporting, USDT’s stability relies more on market perception than verifiable fundamentals.
Security – History of Breaches and Risks
USDT has faced multiple security incidents:
- 2017: Bank accounts frozen due to fraud allegations
- 2017: Hacked for $31 million
- 2018: Critical smart contract vulnerability discovered
- 2018–2019: Investigations into price manipulation during Bitcoin rallies
These recurring issues highlight systemic fragility in both technical execution and corporate governance.
Use Case Potential – Limited to Crypto Markets
USDT thrives primarily as a trading intermediary:
- 70%+ of global crypto trades settle in USDT
- Widely used in China and emerging markets where direct USD trading is restricted
- Popular in DeFi lending protocols as collateral
But outside crypto ecosystems, acceptance is minimal. Merchants prefer real dollars; regulators view USDT with suspicion. Its inability to function as legal tender restricts broader economic utility.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can Libra ever launch successfully given current regulations?
A: Only if it complies with strict AML/KYC rules and operates as a permissioned system under regulatory supervision. Full decentralization appears unlikely.
Q: Is DC/EP truly anonymous?
A: No. While users enjoy privacy from merchants and third parties, the central bank maintains full visibility — enabling monitoring for illicit activities.
Q: Why do people still use USDT despite its risks?
A: Due to high liquidity, deep exchange integration, and lack of alternatives in restricted markets. Network effects keep it dominant despite transparency issues.
Q: Can CBDCs replace physical cash entirely?
A: Gradually yes — especially in urban economies. However, cash will persist in areas with limited tech access or where privacy is paramount.
Q: Will any stablecoin surpass CBDCs in mainstream adoption?
A: Unlikely unless they achieve full reserve transparency and regulatory approval — conditions that may dilute their original decentralized ethos.
👉 Stay ahead in the digital economy with tools built for tomorrow’s finance leaders.
Final Verdict: Who Wins?
When comparing Libra, DC/EP, and USDT, the verdict is clear:
- DC/EP leads in stability, security, and real-world utility, backed by state power and integrated into daily life.
- Libra has vision but faces insurmountable regulatory barriers; its future depends on political compromise.
- USDT remains essential in crypto markets but lacks credibility for broader financial use.
Thus, central bank digital currencies — particularly DC/EP — are best positioned to win the future of payments. They combine innovation with trust, scalability with control, and modernity with legal legitimacy.
While private initiatives like Libra and USDT catalyzed change, the long-term winners will be those anchored in public trust — not corporate interest.