U.S. Stance on Bitcoin Shows Signs of Softening – Chen Chong Questions Whether Central Banks Should Buy In

·

The global financial landscape is undergoing a quiet transformation, and nowhere is this more evident than in the evolving attitude toward Bitcoin. Once dismissed as a speculative fringe asset, Bitcoin is now being reconsidered by major institutions — particularly in the United States — where regulatory voices are beginning to draw parallels between digital currency and traditional stores of value like gold.

Chen Chong, Chairman of the Next Generation Financial Foundation, recently published a thought-provoking analysis titled "A New Era of Financial Games: Bitcoin’s Footing Has Stabilized." In it, he challenges central bankers and policymakers to reconsider their long-standing skepticism toward cryptocurrencies. With growing momentum behind Bitcoin as a potential reserve asset, the question is no longer whether it will be taken seriously — but when.

Bitcoin Gains Legitimacy in Policy Circles

Not long ago, Bitcoin was seen as little more than a volatile experiment with no intrinsic value. But recent developments suggest a shift in perception at the highest levels of U.S. financial governance.

👉 Discover how global financial leaders are redefining digital assets in 2025.

Chen highlights three pivotal events that signal this turning point:

  1. Political Momentum: President-elect Trump has openly advocated for the creation of a national Bitcoin reserve. Meanwhile, the U.S. government already holds approximately 200,000 BTC through asset seizures. Senator Cynthia Lummis has further pushed the envelope with proposed legislation requiring the U.S. to purchase one million Bitcoin within five years.
  2. Geopolitical Endorsement: Russian President Vladimir Putin, during heightened tensions in East Asia, made headlines by suggesting Bitcoin could replace the U.S. dollar as the world’s primary reserve currency — a move aimed at stabilizing global economic order beyond Western control.
  3. Market Reaction: In the weeks following the U.S. election, Bitcoin surged nearly 45%, briefly crossing the $100,000 threshold before correcting slightly to around $95,000.

These developments have sparked speculation within the crypto community: Are major economies quietly accumulating Bitcoin? While concrete evidence remains elusive, the pattern of strategic interest — especially from G20 nations — suggests these moves are far from random.

From Fringe Asset to Digital Gold

Bitcoin debuted in 2009 as an open-source alternative to centralized finance. Over the past decade and a half, its journey has been anything but smooth — marked by boom-and-bust cycles, regulatory crackdowns, and widespread skepticism from traditional finance.

Yet, despite its volatility, adoption has skyrocketed. What began with a few million users has now grown into a global network exceeding 560 million individuals interacting with blockchain technology in some form. The price of one Bitcoin rose from just $320 in 2014 to over $100,000 in late 2024 — a growth trajectory influenced heavily by macroeconomic forces such as quantitative easing (QE) and persistent inflation.

For years, Chen's foundation maintained that Bitcoin lacked intrinsic value, was unsuitable as a payment method, and did not qualify as legal tender. Instead, they categorized it as a commodity — albeit one with unique investment potential driven by generational shifts in financial behavior.

Younger generations, particularly those aged 24–35 (who make up over one-third of all Bitcoin holders), are increasingly disenchanted with legacy banking systems. They prefer decentralized platforms that align with digital-native values: transparency, ownership, and autonomy.

This demographic shift isn’t just cultural — it carries real economic weight. As digital natives gain purchasing power and influence policy debates, governments risk igniting a new kind of class conflict if they fail to recognize the social impact of decentralized finance.

A Paradigm Shift in Central Banking?

Historically, central banks have focused their reserves on foreign currencies (especially USD), government bonds, and physical gold. But inflation has eroded the real value of many traditional assets — prompting renewed debate about diversification.

Chen points out that while Taiwan’s central bank has shown little interest in expanding its gold holdings over the past six years (as noted in the foundation’s 2023 report "All That Glitters Is Gold"), it has also remained silent on digital alternatives like Bitcoin.

However, many commercial banks and financial institutions are already gaining exposure to Bitcoin indirectly — through convertible bonds, crypto-linked ETFs, or private investment vehicles. If central banks continue to ignore this trend, they may find themselves lagging behind both market realities and public sentiment.

The Fed and Treasury Signal Change

A significant shift occurred recently when Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, typically cautious in public remarks, told CNBC that while Bitcoin is not a competitor to the U.S. dollar, it is increasingly seen as a rival to gold — primarily as a speculative store of value rather than a transactional currency.

The next day, the U.S. Treasury Department released a research paper echoing this sentiment, describing Bitcoin as "digital gold" — a decentralized, censorship-resistant asset capable of preserving wealth in uncertain times.

While some officials remain skeptical — including William Dudley, former head of the New York Fed and current Brookings Institution chair — who argues that Bitcoin lacks an exit strategy and carries opportunity costs — the overall tone from Washington is undeniably shifting.

Core Keywords Driving the Conversation

To understand where this narrative is headed, consider these core keywords shaping discourse around Bitcoin and institutional adoption:

These terms reflect both technical trends and broader socioeconomic themes — all converging around one central idea: Bitcoin may soon become part of official monetary strategy.

👉 See how forward-thinking investors are preparing for the next phase of digital finance.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can central banks legally hold Bitcoin as reserves?
A: There is currently no international law prohibiting central banks from holding Bitcoin. However, each country must assess regulatory, security, and custody challenges before making such a decision.

Q: Why compare Bitcoin to gold?
A: Both assets are scarce, durable, and not directly controlled by any single government. Like gold, Bitcoin has a fixed supply (21 million coins), making it resistant to inflation — hence the “digital gold” label.

Q: Isn’t Bitcoin too volatile for reserve status?
A: While price swings exist, long-term data shows increasing stability relative to early years. Institutional adoption and regulatory clarity are helping reduce volatility over time.

Q: How does QE relate to Bitcoin’s rise?
A: Quantitative easing increases money supply, which often leads to inflation. Assets with limited supply — like gold and Bitcoin — tend to appreciate during such periods as investors seek hedges.

Q: Are any countries already treating Bitcoin as official reserve assets?
A: El Salvador adopted Bitcoin as legal tender in 2021. While no major economy has yet added it to formal reserves, discussions in the U.S., UAE, and Singapore indicate growing openness.

Q: What risks do central banks face by ignoring Bitcoin?
A: By excluding emerging assets from reserve portfolios, central banks risk asset devaluation due to inflation, loss of innovation leadership, and reduced relevance among younger populations.

The Strategic Crossroads

As Chen concludes: "If you were a central bank governor today, would you stay passive — or would you begin exploring strategic allocation into Bitcoin?"

With the U.S. Federal Reserve and Treasury now acknowledging Bitcoin’s role as a potential inflation hedge and value-preserving asset, the door has opened for serious consideration.

The era of outright dismissal may be ending. What comes next could redefine how nations think about money, sovereignty, and intergenerational financial equity.

👉 Stay ahead of the curve — explore what institutional-grade crypto access looks like today.